<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>The Lexicographer's Rules</title>
    <link>http://www.grantbarrett.com/</link>
    <description>The personal web site of lexicographer, writer, and editor Grant Barrett.</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>editor@doubletongued.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-04-19T13:50:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
    

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/new_verses_to_my_darling_clementine/</guid>
      <title>New verses to &#8220;My Darling Clementine&#8221;</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/new_verses_to_my_darling_clementine/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Personal</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Ever since we bought some delicious clementines at the farmer's market, I've been composing new verses to "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh_My_Darling,_Clementine">Oh My Darling, Clementine</a>." She dies of a new accident in each one. It's easier to make up new verses to songs I half remember than it is to hunt down the real words and memorize them.<br />
<br />
She took some powder for the muskets<br />
and made some biscuits in a pan.<br />
She put the biscuits on the fire.<br />
Now my darling's in Japan.<br />
<br />
Chorus: Oh my darling, oh my darling,<br />
Oh my darling, Clementine!<br />
Thou art lost and gone forever<br />
Dreadful sorry, Clementine<br />
<br />
She took a charge down into the mine shaft<br />
so that she could make it blow.<br />
The fuse was fast and getting faster.<br />
Oh, my darling, she was slow.<br />
<br />
(chorus)<br />
<br />
She took an axe and took a hatchet<br />
and cut some lumber for the mine.<br />
She was killed by timber last December<br />
Oh, my darlin' Clementine.<br />
<br />
(chorus)<br />
<br />
Chased the cattle from the garden<br />
and up into the trees.<br />
My darlin' was made a bookmark<br />
By a Holstein and falling leaves.<br />
<br />
(chorus)<br />
<br />
Found a rattle on the prairie.<br />
She wrapped and tied it in a case.<br />
She gave her boy the pretty present.<br />
He got two fangs stuck in his face]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-04-19T12:50:44+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/how_do_you_pronounce_both_please_take_the_survey/</guid>
      <title>How do you pronounce &#8220;both&#8221;? Please take the survey!</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/how_do_you_pronounce_both_please_take_the_survey/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Language and Languages, Dictionaries and Lexicography</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Do you pronounce the word "both" differently from other English-speakers? <a href="http://bit.ly/9xnxTk">Take the survey</a> and tell others about it. The more respondents we get, the more we'll know.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-03-10T00:31:56+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/garbanzos_or_chickpeas/</guid>
      <title>Garbanzos or chickpeas?</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/garbanzos_or_chickpeas/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Personal</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Which term do you use: garbanzo bean or chickpea? <a href="https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dFl6TXlFbXNlQnZ5dVBhcGcxTVZMeGc6MA">The survey is here</a>.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/evilpeach/2734541201/" target="_blank"><a rel="highslide" class="highslide" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3115/2734541201_ba3e277ecd_m.jpg" title=""><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3115/2734541201_ba3e277ecd_m.jpg" border="0" class="sfimageleft" title="" width="200" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/betsssssy/3184473915/" target="_blank"><a rel="highslide" class="highslide" href="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3309/3184473915_40e67f76f4_m.jpg" title=""><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3309/3184473915_40e67f76f4_m.jpg" border="0" class="sfimageleft" title="" width="200" alt="" /></a>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-03-04T17:01:53+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/buzzwords_of_2009_in_the_new_york_times/</guid>
      <title>Buzzwords of 2009 in the New York Times</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/buzzwords_of_2009_in_the_new_york_times/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Personal, Language and Languages, My Commentary, Dictionaries and Lexicography</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[My <a href="http://bit.ly/buzz09">annual buzzwords of the year piece for the <i>New York Times</i></a> has appeared today, featuring expressions such as <i> aporkalypse</i>, <i>swine flu party</i>, <i>El Stiffo</i>, <i>Octomom</i>, and <i> sexting</i>. Also, there's a <a href="http://bit.ly/buzzQA2">discussion going on about them on the <i>New York Times</i> Ideas blog</a>, where you can leave your own comments about my choices, or give your own buzzword of the year. ]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-12-20T14:17:53+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/a_letter_found_inside_birds_of_the_pacific_coast1/</guid>
      <title>A note found inside Birds of the Pacific Coast</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/a_letter_found_inside_birds_of_the_pacific_coast1/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Books and Literature, Personal</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Recently I bought a copy of <i><a href="http://www.archive.org/stream/birdsofpacificco00elio#page/n7/mode/2up">Birds of the Pacific Coast</a></i> by William Ayres Eliot at <a href="http://www.bstreetbooks.net/">B Street Books</a> in San Mateo. <br />
<br />
It is a charming book, filled with color plates (which you can see <a href="http://www.archive.org/stream/birdsofpacificco00elio#page/n7/mode/2up">here</a>) and interesting tidbits, but I bought it because it contained this handwritten letter inserted in its pages:<br />
<br />
<center><br />
<a href="http://www.doubletongued.org/birds-letter.bg.jpg"><img src="http://www.doubletongued.org/birds-letter.sm.jpg"></a>.<br />
</center><br />
<br />
It says this:<br />
<br />
<blockquote>"Those bird watchers who first spotted the two <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=hfFh9_ZACngC&pg=PA10&dq=%22Crested+Laughing+Thrush%22&lr=&num=100&as_brr=3&ei=_70pS4_PI4XclQSLvP28Cw&cd=5#v=onepage&q=%22Crested%20Laughing%20Thrush%22&f=false">white Crested Laughing Thrushes</a> from Southeast Asia may want to know they're big (and loud) on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Hill,_San_Francisco">Russian Hill</a>, hanging out in <a href="http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=rBAVAAAAIBAJ&sjid=IwMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=4942%2C3862398">Louis Petri</a>'s lush property and being fed by the fancy likes of <a href="http://www.sfchronicle.us/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1997/11/06/MN39570.DTL&hw=sagging&sn=097&sc=235">Elinor Chatfield-Taylor</a> and <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/01/21/MNKEESLING26.DTL">Mary Keesling</a>. Noisy devils, but amusing — The birds, I mean. The feathered ones — that is... Heckwithit—"</blockquote><br />
The two women were stars of the San Francisco social scene in the 1950s and perhaps later. Louis Petri was a wine magnate. <br />
<br />
The letter was probably written after 1948, which is when, according to the <a href="http://www.sfchronicle.us/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/1997/11/06/MN39570.DTL&hw=sagging&sn=097&sc=235">obituary linked above</a>, Elinor Chatfield-Taylor moved to San Francisco.<br />
<br />
The book is inscribed with the name "Vera Gillett" on the flyleaf, but I could turn up no one by the name who might obviously be connected to the big names above.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-12-17T03:52:01+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/now_accepting_nominations_for_the_2009_word_of_the_year_and_the_2000_9_word/</guid>
      <title>Now accepting nominations for the 2009 &#8220;word of the year&#8221; and the 2000&#45;9 &#8220;word of the decade&#8221;</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/now_accepting_nominations_for_the_2009_word_of_the_year_and_the_2000_9_word/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Language and Languages, Dictionaries and Lexicography, The Words</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The American Dialect Society is now accepting nominations for the "word of the year" of 2009, as well as for the "word of the decade" for 2000-2009<br />
<br />
What is the word or phrase which best characterizes the year or the decade? What expression most reflects the ideas, events, and themes which have occupied the English-speaking world, especially North America?<br />
<br />
Nominations should be sent to woty@americandialect.org. They can also be made in Twitter by using the hashtag #woty09.<br />
<br />
They will be considered for the American Dialect Society's 20th annual word-of-the-year vote, the longest-running vote of its kind in the world and the word-of-the-year event up to which all others lead. It will be held in Baltimore on Friday, January 8, 2010. <br />
<br />
The best "word of the year" candidates will be:<br />
<br />
&#8212;new or newly popular in 2009<br />
&#8212;widely or prominently used in 2009<br />
&#8212;indicative or reflective of the popular discourse<br />
<br />
The best "word of the decade" candidates will be:<br />
<br />
&#8212;especially prominent or important throughout the years 2000-2009<br />
&#8212;indicative of trends, fads, upheavals, groundswells, or sea changes which affected history, culture, or society throughout the years 2000-2009.<br />
<br />
Multi-word compounds or phrases that act as stand-alone lexical items are welcomed, as well.<br />
<br />
Sub-categories for "word of the year" include most useful, most creative, most unnecessary, most outrageous, most euphemistic, most likely to succeed, and least likely to succeed.<br />
<br />
The vote is informed by the members’ expertise in the study of words, but it is far from a solemn occasion. Members in the 120-year-old academic organization include linguists, lexicographers, etymologists, grammarians, historians, researchers, writers, authors, editors, professors, university students, and independent scholars. In conducting the vote, they act in fun and do not pretend to be officially inducting words into the English language. Instead, they are highlighting that language change is normal, ongoing, and entertaining.<br />
<br />
Past winners can be found on the <a href="http://www.americandialect.org/woty/">society's web site</a>.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://americandialect.org/baltimore2010">More information about the annual meeting</a>.<br />
<br />
<p><br />
<br />]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-11-15T20:31:51+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/how_much_underworld_slang_is_still_used_from_80_years_ago/</guid>
      <title>How much underworld slang is still used from 80 years ago?</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/how_much_underworld_slang_is_still_used_from_80_years_ago/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Language and Languages, My Commentary</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[My latest column in the <i>Malaysia Star</i>: <a href="http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2009/10/21/lifefocus/4916592&sec=lifefocus">Underworld lingo</a>. The column, as always, is written for an audience that may not be perfectly fluent with English.<br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
In 1931, the <i>Los Angeles Times </i>published a story headlined <i>Underworld lingo</i>. It was a lexicon of criminal cant and jargon written by Ben Kendall, a police reporter.<br />
<br />
Kendall formerly was a police reporter in Chicago, too, where he uncovered bribes and corruption by making friends with pickpockets, safeblowers, and shoplifters. Some eight years later, Kendall would be indicted and convicted for his role in bribery related to illegal gambling in Los Angeles.<br />
<br />
So, given his experience on both sides of the law, one can only assume that the lingo he recorded was genuine. But how much of it lasted? Seventy-eight years on, we find that some of the lingo is still in use, while some of it has vanished.<br />
<br />
<i>Alky</i> is recorded by Kendall as “straight alcohol.” Most people today would use it to mean an acoholic drinker rather than the drink itself.<br />
<br />
<i>Angle</i> he records as “a plan; a lead,” which is more or less how it’s used today. If someone says, “I don’t know what his angle is, but he’s up to no good,” they’d mean that the fellow seemed to be planning something suspicious.<br />
<br />
<i>Booster</i> does indeed still mean a shoplifter. <i>Boost</i> in general means “to steal” and a <i>booster bag</i> is a specially designed bag that is meant to conceal stolen merchandise as it is taken out of a store.<br />
<br />
<i>Chiv</i> is common still in prison lingo, though it’s usually spelled <i>shiv</i>. An even older form is <i>chive</i>, meaning a knife as far back as the 17th century. A <i>shiv</i> is a knife, too, but in prison slang it is especially a crude, improvised one, such as a toothbrush that has had a razor blade attached to it.<br />
<br />
<i>Grand</i> still means a thousand dollars. <i>Take</i> still means “a share,” too, but it’s a fairly straight business term: “What’s my take on all this? If he gets 15% of the ticket money, I want 15%, too.” A <i>pay-off</i> is still a bribe or a payment made to someone to keep them from hurting you or your things.<br />
<br />
<i>Haywire</i>, Kendall writes, is a “mental aberration.” Today we’d say that a machine <i>went haywire</i> more often than we would say a person went haywire. We mean the machine started malfunctioning.<br />
<br />
<i>Jam</i> still means trouble or a sticky situation. “Can you help me out with the rent this month? I’m in a jam until payday.” Or, “I’m in a jam with the wife. She doesn’t know I was at the bar last night. Tell her I was at your house.”<br />
<br />
<i>Lug</i> he defines as a “stupid fellow; a hanger-on,” which is close to the way we’d use it today, but not quite. We’d say a man (almost never a woman) is a <i>big lug</i>, which would mean that he was kind of stupid, but also clumsy or ungainly. It’s often used as an affectionate insult. “You big lug! You didn’t have to bring me flowers!” might be the kind of thing a woman would say in a fake tough voice.<br />
<br />
<i>Muscling in</i> is still done pretty much as Kendall defined it: “to force one’s way in for a cut on the profits of a venture.” People still <i>get nailed</i>, too, meaning they get caught or arrested. And <i>screwy</i> still means “crazy.”<br />
<br />
Kendall calls a <i>wing-ding</i> “a fit; berserk,” which is a meaning that other dictionaries show to have been more common in the past. The <i>Oxford English Dictionary</i> defines it more fully as “a fit or spasm, esp. as simulated by a drug addict” and in a “weakened sense, a furious outburst.”<br />
<br />
However, only a later meaning is used today, which is “a party.” I daresay that no-one who today <i>throws a wing-ding</i> is faking a seizure so that they can get controlled drugs from a doctor.<br />
<br />
<i>Yentz</i> hasn’t lasted. It meant “to outsmart” or “to defeat.” It was sometimes spelled <i>yence</i> or <i>yince</i> and had another crude, sexual meaning that meant “to have a non-romantic act of copulation.” Both meanings are synonymous with different meanings of <i>screw.</i><br />
<br />
<i>Loogan</i> (sometimes spelled <i>loogin</i> or<i> lugan</i>, according to the <i>Historical Dictionary of American Slang)</i> is also no longer used to mean “a minor hoodlum,” though <i>hood</i>, recorded by Kendall, is still used to mean “a petty gangster.”<br />
<br />
For what it’s worth, I find <i>loogan</i> in <i>Jamieson’s Scottish Dictionary</i> of 1825 with a definition of “a rogue” and in a couple of modern amateur lists of prison slang online as meaning “mentally ill prisoner” in Ontario, Canada.<br />
<br />
Perhaps one of the most interesting additions to Kendall’s slang list is his definition of <i>quim</i> as “anybody’s sweetheart.” Historically, and more often, this term has meant “the vagina.”<br />
<br />
Even when used to mean “a woman” (a usage confined mainly to North America) it has usually been the crudest of terms meant to refer to the woman as <i>chattel</i> (a personal possession) or as nothing more than the target of sexual acts. It objectifies her as being no better than what her sexual organs are good for.<br />
<br />
It’s possible that Kendall only knew the term in a purer, more innocent form. But I imagine, especially given his connection with the rougher corners of the underworld, that he knew very well about its less polite meaning. He would have had a laugh at getting such a coarse word printed in a daily newspaper in a time when even <i>hell</i> and <i>damn</i> might not have been allowed.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-10-28T03:46:39+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/remembering_william_safire/</guid>
      <title>Remembering William Safire</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/remembering_william_safire/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Personal, Language and Languages, My Commentary, Dictionaries and Lexicography</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I want to take a moment to remember William Safire for his kindness.<br />
<br />
He was unstinting with his help in matters that were important to me. He gave generous public praise to my radio show, <i><a href="http://www.waywordradio.org/">A Way with Words</a></i>. He supported the <i>Historical Dictionary of American Slang</i> when it applied for funding during my editorship, by writing letters of support that shone with erudition and respect. He gave my book, the <i>Oxford Dictionary of American Political Slang</i>, a much kinder review than it deserved. He gave a cover blurb for my <i>Official Dictionary of Unofficial English</i>. He mentioned <a href="http://www.wordnik.com/">Wordnik</a>, my latest project, in his column, generating interest from many thousands. He consented to a long interview about his political dictionary. <br />
<br />
Perhaps most importantly, he gave me credit as often as possible in his column for helping him with his research, which allowed my own star to rise in the "language dodge," which is what he called this maven-rich, grammarizing, languagey niche we both inhabited. He did this for lots of people and he did it unbegrudgingly.<br />
<br />
Thanks, Bill. You were kind.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-09-27T18:43:49+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/the_elephant_in_the_language/</guid>
      <title>The elephant in the language</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/the_elephant_in_the_language/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Personal, Language and Languages, My Commentary</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Today I want to talk about elephants.<br />
<br />
One of the joys of my work as a dictionary editor is finding arbitrary but interesting connections among words, such as those colloquial expressions in English that have to do with elephants.<br />
<br />
One elephant you might encounter in English is a <b>white elephant</b>. This is something like <i>a building or a piece of furniture that is big, costly, and seemingly impossible to sell or give away</i>. It can also be <i>a programme or organisation that is a sinkhole for money</i>, meaning that it is expensive and produces little of value. It continues to exist because it is in the favour of some person in power, or else because of inertia.<br />
<br />
Related to this is a <b>white elephant sale</b>, which is <i>the kind of event at which you are apt to find things for sale which are perfectly fine</i> <i>– working, clean, and otherwise OK – but yet which are unwanted</i>. Eight-track tape players, maybe. Or a hand-cranked washing machine. Clothing that was fashionable 30 years ago and has yet to come back into style. Art made by the artless and given as gifts to the thankless – or once bought by the tasteless.<br />
<br />
<b>Pink elephants</b> are a joking way to describe the <i>hallucinations – strange, imaginary visions and thoughts – you might see if you are excessively drunk or under the influence of drugs</i>. A pink elephant is also used to mean <i>something extraordinary</i>.<br />
<br />
Pink elephant is also often used when talking about how hard it is to not think of something once it’s been mentioned. If I tell you: “Don’t think of pink elephants,” what are you going to do? You’re going to think about pink elephants.<br />
<br />
The approximate opposite of a pink elephant is the <b>elephant in the room</b> or <b>elephant in the living room</b>. “They ignored the elephant in the room: their daughter still would not speak to them until they agreed to let her go to the beach with her friends.”<br />
<br />
This sort of elephant is so big you can’t miss it. <i>Everyone knows it’s there, but nobody mentions it, usually because there seems to be no happy solution to whatever problem that elephant represents</i>.<br />
<br />
Elephants are often used metaphorically because of their size. In gold mining and the petroleum business, <i>a piece of land with very large deposits </i>might be called an <b>elephant</b>. Similarly, <b>jumbo</b>, meaning <i>very big</i>, is connected in history to a famous elephant who was considered to be a very large specimen. Since the 1860s, the term has been used for <i>anything that is larger than ordinary</i>.<br />
<br />
Indirectly, <b>dumbo</b>, meaning <i>a dumb person</i>, is an elephant-ish term, as it was popularised by the elephant who flew with his ears in the 1941 Disney movie <i>Dumbo</i>. It is probably a play off of jumbo.<br />
<br />
One outdated expression that is now little used except by writers who are looking for a bit of historical colour – meaning you’ll probably never hear this expression from the mouth of your average English speaker – is <b>to see the elephant</b>.<br />
<br />
This means <i>to become experienced</i>, or <i>to have passed through life or some event (or series of events) and come out on the other side wiser</i>, or <i>to just plain see, hear, feel, and experience everything that an occasion, or life itself, can provide</i>. You might say of a soldier: “You could tell when a soldier had seen the elephant. He had a thousand-yard stare, he could fall asleep at a moment’s notice, and his commanding officer listened to his opinions.”<br />
<br />
(A thousand-yard stare is a sharp, unblinking gaze that appears to see nothing at all but at the same time seems to look through you and into your soul.)<br />
<br />
By the way, to see the light or to have a come-to-Jesus moment are similar to see the elephant. <b>To see the light</b> means <i>to finally come around to someone else’s point of view</i>. A <b>come-to-Jesus moment</b> is a<i> revelation or sudden overturning of previous attitudes or beliefs</i>. Both of these are still common.<br />
<br />
A rare bit of old-fashioned jargon that I picked up from my research is the expression <b>the elephant walks</b>, meaning, “<i>it’s payday</i>”. I found it in a collection of jargon from elevator constructors in the 1930s. I like the expression and use it, but the elephant in my room is that when I do, nobody knows what I’m talking about.<br />
<br />
<i>Grant Barrett is editorial director of Wordnik, <a href="http://www.wordnik.com" target="_blank">http://www.wordnik.com</a>, a new online dictionary that aims to collect every word in English.</i>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-08-12T23:18:33+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/updates_will_continue_to_be_slow_for_double_tongued/</guid>
      <title>Updates will continue to be slow for Double&#45;Tongued</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/updates_will_continue_to_be_slow_for_double_tongued/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Personal</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[My family and I are in the process of moving ourselves and our belongings from New York City to the San Francisco Bay area—completely across North America—so updates will continue to be sporadic on this web site. Stay subscribed, though, because they will resume their previous vigor in just a couple of weeks.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-07-20T01:53:39+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/call_of_nature/</guid>
      <title>Call of nature</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/call_of_nature/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Personal, Language and Languages, The Words</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[My <a href="http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2009/7/1/lifefocus/4168190&sec=lifefocus">latest column in the <i>Malaysia Star</i></a>. It is written for English learners.<br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
Bodily functions are a rich source of English slang, so naturally, we have a lot of ways of saying “urinate,” “defecate” and “go somewhere to urinate and/or defecate.” Here’s a quick rundown of appropriate usage.<br />
<br />
<i>Freshen up</i>. This can mean anything from “wash one’s face and hands,” to “fix one’s make-up,” to “straighten, retuck, refasten, or smooth one’s clothing.” It covers all the things one is likely to do in a bathroom or WC. Safe to use by anyone anywhere, though perhaps it’s a bit more likely to be used by or to a woman.<br />
<br />
<i>Visit the facilities</i>. Same story: vague enough to cover anything that happens in a room where there is a toilet and a sink. Safe for all people and places. You might say, “I need to visit the facilities. Where would I find them?”<br />
<br />
<i>Powder one’s nose</i>. Strictly for women, this one explicitly refers to make-up, yet it is widely used even by women who don’t use makeup. It’s a cover-up! Can be used anywhere to cover any purpose in the little room with the porcelain fixtures.<br />
<br />
<i>Go to the bathroom</i> covers both visiting the little room as well as the acts of urination and defecation themselves. Though it is less polite and less vague than the expressions above, it is safe to use in front of almost anyone, though it’s far more likely to be heard in North America. In the UK, go to the WC is similarly used. (Americans understand “WC” but they don’t use it much.)<br />
<br />
<i>Use the toilet</i> has pretty much the same usage, though for many Americans, toilet refers specifically to the white, water-filled porcelain seat that you sit upon in a bathroom and not to the room itself. If you say, “I need to go to the toilet,” they think of you doing certain bodily acts and not just of you going to a specific room.<br />
<br />
<i>Make water</i>. Sufficiently euphemistic that it can be used in a non-giggly way by patients and doctors when discussing the body. No one will be embarrassed by too much detail, and yet it’s less formal and less clinical than a word like “urinate” or, worse, micturate, a synonym. It’s not much used elsewhere in everyday colloquial English.<br />
<br />
<i>Go to the little girls’ or little boys’ room</i>. Used by adults talking to children but also used by adults talking among themselves and not often in a joking way. Adults probably remember it being used by their elementary school teachers, who are masters at finding ways to talk about the bathroom so that mobs of children don’t giggle.<br />
<br />
<i>Go number 1 or number 2</i>, to urinate or defecate. This is also part of the language of teachers, parents, and children. Children might say to a teacher, “I need to go number 2.” Then the teacher knows how long the child should be out of the classroom and whether or not to come along.<br />
<br />
<i>Use the potty or go potty </i>means to visit the bathroom or to urinate or defecate. This is language used when talking to children or in the presence of children. Similar terms are take a <i>pee-pee</i> or <i>poo-poo</i>, go <i>pee-pee</i> or <i>poo-poo</i>, or, for urination only, go <i>wee-wee</i> (British and American), to<i> tinkle</i> (British and American), to <i>widdle</i> (British), and to <i>piddle</i> (British).<br />
<br />
Plain old <i>go pee</i> and <i>go poop</i> (without the second syllable repeated) are fine to use around children and are used among family members or close friends of any age.<br />
<br />
<i>See a man about a horse</i> is an adult way of saying, “go to the bathroom,” as in, “I need to see a man about a horse and then we can hit the road” (I need to urinate and then we can leave). The expression is so widely used that there’s not much strength left in its euphemism.<br />
<br />
<i>Evacuate one’s bowels</i>. An inoffensive but not altogether euphemistic term typical of the sort used by medical professionals and police when making formal descriptions. There’s usually a notion that the bowel evacuation was not intentional, as might happen during a car accident or in the case of diarrhoea. It is rather crude and not to be used to excuse yourself during a meal, when traveling with family, or even when partying with friends. If you said, “Excuse me, this is a fine meal, but I need to go evacuate my bowels,” it would bring unpleasant associations to mind.<br />
<br />
<i>Take a piss</i>. To urinate. This is crude and mainly used by and among men. Not a good one for polite company, nor is <i>take a dump</i>, which means to defecate. The British <i>take</i> or <i>take a slash</i> (urinate) has the same kind of usage: it’s used mainly among men and boys.<br />
<br />
Similarly, <i>take a leak</i> and <i>drain the lizard</i> aren’t really all that polite and not likely to be used by or among women except in a joking way. Only slightly more polite is<i> take</i> or <i>go for a wizz</i>, also spelled <i>wiz</i>, <i>whiz</i>, and <i>wazz</i>.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-07-02T00:53:45+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/feedburner_urls_that_have_huge_accidental_traffic/</guid>
      <title>Feedburner URLs that have huge accidental traffic</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/feedburner_urls_that_have_huge_accidental_traffic/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>My Commentary, Quibbling</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[When I tried last month to consolidate my feeds into one, things did not go as planned. I lost about 3000 subscribers, for one thing, mainly due to RSS readers that don't know how to handle the very standard and ordinary htaccess redirect. I did this through Feedburner, which hosts my feeds. Feedburner also put a human-readable "this feed has moved" message in the feed and gave everyone 30 days to switch before closing the feed altogether.<br />
<br />
But even more oddly, once the 30 days were up, Facebook, which was automatically importing my old feed and which did not automatically pick up the htaccess redirect to the new feed, redirected to <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/index.rdf">http://feeds.feedburner.com/index.rdf</a> which is an all-Chinese news feed. My Facebook friends noticed long before I did and I've only just gotten around to resolving the issue. <br />
<br />
That feed URL is extraordinary and is the purpose of this post (because, really, technical snafus on the Internet? Also ordinary). That feed likely picks up a HUGE amount of extra feed traffic because anyone who has moved their feed over from another server to Feedburner is highly likely to have that "index.rdf" at the end of their URL. If they don't change their entire feed URL on their pages to the new Feedburner URL they have picked out; that is, if they change only the host name and not the path after it, then, ta-da! a lot of people will accidentally be reading a lot of Chinese news.<br />
<br />
(I'm not completely sure about that explanation, but it's all I have for now.)<br />
<br />
What's most extraordinary to me is that that URL, http://feeds.feedburner.com/index.rdf, should even be made available to ANYONE. There are some other URLs that are also allotted that it seems to me should be reserved because of the high incidence of their use in standard web-site-building and blog-hosting software. (The suffix apparently doesn't matter: index.rdf, index.xml, index.php, etc., all point to the same place.)<br />
<br />
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/RSS">http://feeds.feedburner.com/RSS</a><br />
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/RSS2">http://feeds.feedburner.com/RSS2</a><br />
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/feed">http://feeds.feedburner.com/feed</a><br />
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/atom">http://feeds.feedburner.com/atom</a><br />
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/rdf">http://feeds.feedburner.com/rdf</a><br />
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-06-17T00:41:29+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/i_held_samuel_johnsons_1755_dictionary_in_my_hands/</guid>
      <title>I held Samuel Johnson&#8217;s 1755 dictionary in my hands</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/i_held_samuel_johnsons_1755_dictionary_in_my_hands/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Language and Languages, Dictionaries and Lexicography</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Last night I got to see some rare first editions in a private library, including a copy of Samuel Johnson's first 1755 dictionary. I held it in my two hands and flipped through the pages. Very exciting! We also saw a copy of the wire service roll recording the teletypes sent out on the day Kennedy was assassinated, a copy of the Beatles biography signed by all four men, an original Monty Python movie script with handwritten annotations, and I don't know what all. Brilliant.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.doubletongued.org/johnsons-dictionary.jpg"><img src="http://www.doubletongued.org/johnsons-dictionary-sm.jpg"></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.doubletongued.org/johnson-detail.jpg"><img src="http://www.doubletongued.org/johnson-detail-sm.jpg"></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.doubletongued.org/johnson-zootomy.jpg"><img src="http://www.doubletongued.org/johnson-zootomy-sm.jpg"></a><br />
<br />
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-06-09T12:18:02+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/new_doors_are_open_for_wordnikcom_a_dictionary_that_aims_to_show_all_the_wo/</guid>
      <title>New: doors are open for Wordnik.com, a dictionary that aims to show all the words</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/new_doors_are_open_for_wordnikcom_a_dictionary_that_aims_to_show_all_the_wo/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Personal, Language and Languages, Dictionaries and Lexicography</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[This is what I've been doing: <a href="http://www.wordnik.com/">Wordnik</a>, an info-rich online dictionary that plans to show as much information as possible about <i>all</i> the words in English. The login requirement has been removed as of this morning, so the beta site is open!]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-06-08T10:24:29+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/boohoo_wah_diddums_words_of_fake_sympathy/</guid>
      <title>Boohoo, wah, &amp;amp; diddums: words of fake sympathy</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/boohoo_wah_diddums_words_of_fake_sympathy/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Personal, Language and Languages, My Commentary</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Here's my latest column—written for learners of English—from the <i>Malaysia Star</i>.<br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
Sometimes, when you are explaining how someone <i>done you wrong</i> (a very informal and not altogether grammatical way of saying someone “treated you badly”), a listener will hold up a hand and slowly rub his index finger and thumb together.<br />
<br />
If you’ve never seen this before, you’ll likely say, “What’s that?” Of course you will. They’re being rather obvious about it, almost begging you to ask.<br />
<br />
Then they say with a <i>smug</i> look – smug means “self-satisfied” or “excessively proud” – “It’s the world’s tiniest violin. And it’s playing for you!”<br />
<br />
In the movies, a violin is the kind of instrument used to play sentimental and weepy solos during scenes in which a hero meets his death or a mother loses a child.<br />
<br />
By comparing your <i>sob story</i> – your tale of woe, your recounting of your misfortunes – to something very dramatic that might require the sorrowful sounds of strings, your listener is saying they do <i>not</i> agree with you. They think you are melodramatic or wrong. They have no sympathy for you.<br />
<br />
(“Playing” the world’s tiniest violin is funny just once, at most. It’s often not funny at all. Play it too often and you’re a <i>boor</i> – a rude person.)<br />
<br />
By the way, in another conversation that two-fingered gesture might mean money, although the thumb and the index finger rub together much faster in a way that resembles counting out banknotes.<br />
<br />
There are a wide variety of terms used to treat sympathy, or lack of it.<br />
<br />
Boohoo might be the most common one. Outside of books for the very young, boohoo is used mostly to pretend to be crying – it’s <i>onomatopoeic</i>, meaning that it sounds vaguely like weeping and is an <i>imitative </i>word – or, as in the case of the tiniest violin, to mock someone else.<br />
<br />
If a family member complains about the way you pack their suitcase, you might say, “Well, boohoo. If you don’t like the way I do it, then do it yourself.”<br />
<br />
<i>Wah</i> is the same: it sounds like a young baby crying, so much so that when my son was very young, my wife and I would joke that he had read the baby handbook. Many of his cries of frustration sound exactly like <i>wah</i>. But again, it’s mostly used for imitation or for making fun of someone else.<br />
<br />
Decades later, I can just hear my brother and me taunting my little sister (<i>little</i> is sometimes used to mean “younger”) with a fake baby talk: “Wah, pwoor widdle baby gonna kwy?” (“Wah, poor little baby going to cry?”).<br />
<br />
In British English there’s a similar word, <i>diddums</i>, which began more or less as a nonsense word for soothing a child but now is often used as a way of expressing fake sympathy, which is to say, no sympathy at all.<br />
<br />
A: “Watch where you’re going!”<br />
B: “Oh, diddums fall down?”<br />
<br />
<i>Too bad</i>! is another one. It means, “You don’t like it? I don’t care.” If someone says, “You’re driving too fast!” you might respond, “Too bad! If you don’t like it, you can get out and walk.”<br />
<br />
Be careful with <i>too bad</i>. Although it can be said if you intend to show genuine sympathy to someone, I believe it is more often used to show false sympathy.<br />
<br />
If someone says, “I didn’t get that job I wanted,” you could say “Too bad!” but you had better <i>punch</i> (say) those words so that the “too” is louder and so there’s real emotion there. You need to<i> look</i> sorry for them. Otherwise, it might sound like you’re using “too bad” to be unsympathetic and dismissive.<br />
<br />
The <i>go-to</i> source (meaning the one place where you’re sure to find answers) for this kind of language is the work of Iona and Peter Opie. These two folklorists and fieldworkers have a couple of fantastic books about children.<br />
<br />
The best one of the bunch is <i>The Lore And Language Of Schoolchildren</i>. In a section called “Unpopular Children: Jeers And Torments,” the Opies offer long lists of taunting names, epithets, and scornful rhymes gathered from both sides of the Atlantic. A typical rhyme used to taunt a child who is being <i>picked</i> <i>on</i> (who is being made fun of):<br />
<br />
Cry, baby, cry,<br />
Put your finger in your eye,<br />
And tell your mother<br />
It wasn’t I.<br />
<br />
Of course, the language changes, so the Opies did not collect evidence for <i>tough cookies</i>!, which is used the same as “too bad!”<br />
<br />
One step up from the unsympathetic <i>tough cookies</i> is <i>tough titty</i>, which is mildly rude, and even further up is <i>tough shit</i>, which is thoroughly rude and not the sort of thing you’d say to anyone except very good friends.<br />
<br />
The Opies also have nothing on <i>sucks to be you</i>, which, like the tiniest violin, shows no sympathy to someone who has told a terrible tale of woe.<br />
<br />
You are now sufficiently linguistically equipped to be seven years old on an American playground.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-06-03T12:14:34+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/my_book_is_now_available_at_no_cost_as_an_e_book_download/</guid>
      <title>My book is now available at no cost as an e&#45;book download</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/my_book_is_now_available_at_no_cost_as_an_e_book_download/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Books and Literature, Personal, Language and Languages, My Commentary, Dictionaries and Lexicography</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Since my book <i>The Official Dictionary of Unofficial English</i> is now available on the <a href="http://englishtips.org/index.php?newsid=1150813907">bootleg e-book sites</a> ("pirate" is the wrong term, I think), I've decided to make it available for download at no cost. This is not a big deal. The book never sold more than a few thousand copies, the copyright is mine (even though the publisher, McGraw-Hill, incorrectly printed the copyright as theirs), the book is being remaindered, and all the rights are now reverting to me. <br />
<br />
But the main point here is that I'd like to draw people to my site for the free download, not to some shady place on the Internet. So:<br />
<br />
<b><a href="http://www.doubletongued.org/Official_Dictionary_of_Unofficial_English-Grant-Barrett-0071458042.pdf">Download the <i>The Official Dictionary of Unofficial English</i> at no charge.</a> (PDF 2.7MB)</b><br />
<br />
No fees, registrations, logins, passwords, ad-clicking, or hoop-jumping required.<br />
<br />
By the way, the way these books get out there is usually simple. Sometimes the files leak from publishers, sometimes from authors, sometimes they're scanned from paper to pixels, etc., etc., Sometimes people pretend to be blind and contact the publisher to ask for a digital copy of a book so they can use it with their screen readers that translate the digital pages into something they can understand. The publisher sends a digital copy and in a few days it's all over the Internet.<br />
<br />
Make no mistake: I'm not angry. Just resigned. I knew it would happen.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-05-25T11:18:09+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/jitterbug_thug_and_dance/</guid>
      <title>Jitterbug thug and dance</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/jitterbug_thug_and_dance/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Language and Languages, My Commentary, Dictionaries and Lexicography</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[My latest fortnightly column, written for an audience of English learners, has been <a href="http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2009/5/20/lifefocus/3899037&sec=lifefocus">published in the Malaysia Star</a>.<br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
When a circuit judge in Florida was reported to have told a man who took up the habit of crack cocaine at age 47 that he would be joining the “jitterbugs”, she didn’t mean he’d be on the dance floor swinging and jerking to the sounds of Tommy Dorsey. She meant he would be joining the juvenile delinquents and the thugs on the street.<br />
<br />
Slang language is filled with telescoping synonyms for otherwise normal everyday words, but it also has many identically spelled words with very different meanings. Sometimes they come from the same origins. Sometimes they arise separately, live different lives, and pass for different kinds of currency in completely different social groups. The dance jitterbug and the thug jitterbug are good examples.<br />
<br />
Just what is a jitterbug? It’s all of these: a jittery person, a person who dances the jitterbug, a foolish or ignorant young person, or a juvenile delinquent.<br />
<br />
The verb jitterbug has a few more meanings: to <i>dance the jitterbug</i>, to hop about rapidly or fool around, to saunter or swagger, or to engage in gang fighting.<br />
<br />
Who can say which came first? Did the different jitterbugs arrive in American English together, like contestants at a dance marathon trying to see which one could last the longest?<br />
<br />
Since slang is self-reinforcing, meaning that it tends to feed on itself, breed its own descendants, and abandon its own offspring when necessary, we can claim with some confidence that all the jitterbugs worked together. There are a few other reasons, too.<br />
<br />
For one, it’s a fun, funny word, just the kind that catches the fancy, engages the ear. Those of the kinds of words that travel well, and words that travel well tend to fork into other meanings.<br />
<br />
For two, all the recorded evidence shows that many of the different jitterbug meanings appeared at about the same time.<br />
<br />
For three, there’s also a lot of overlap in the meanings. Most are youth-oriented. There’s also a rebel component: gang fighting, sauntering, swagger, delinquency, foolishness, and ignorance, are all behaviours outside of the norm, and perhaps in a “these kids today!” way, we can include the jitterbug dance and its dancers, which were mocked even when the fad was in its heyday.<br />
<br />
Famed bandleader Artie Shaw is said to have suggested in 1939 of the dance faddists that, in one newspaper columnist’s version, “if you scratched the head of a jitterbug you’ll find the brain of a moron”.<br />
<br />
All of these factors indicate there’s a pretty good chance all the different kinds of jitterbug spring from the same source. But what source was that?<br />
<br />
A 1934 song by Cab Calloway and others, called ‘Jitter Bug’, seems to have launched the word into American English, although Calloway probably did not invent the word:<br />
<br />
<i>If you’d like to be a jitter bug,</i><br />
<i>First thing you must do is get a jug,</i><br />
<i>Put whiskey, wine and gin within,</i><br />
<i>And shake it all up and then begin.</i><br />
<i>Grab a cup and start to toss,</i><br />
<i>You’re now drinking jitter sauce!</i><br />
<i>Don’t you worry, you just mug,</i><br />
<i>And then you’ll be a jitter bug!</i><br />
<br />
Though it is less well known than the kicking-it-up-at-the-heels jitterbug, the delinquent jitterbug as meant by the Florida judge is alive and well in modern American slang. Hip-hop outfit The Coup, in a cut called ‘The Liberation of Lonzo Williams’ off the 1999 <i>Kill My Landlord</i> album, brought the divergent meanings back together: “He was a jitterbug thug, at the dance, cuttin’ a rug.”]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-05-20T12:02:18+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/the_fantods_and_the_cold_robbies/</guid>
      <title>The Fantods and the Cold Robbies</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/the_fantods_and_the_cold_robbies/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Language and Languages, My Commentary</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[My latest column in the <i><a href="http://thestar.com.my/lifestyle/story.asp?file=/2009/5/6/lifefocus/3831405&sec=lifefocus">Malaysia Star</a></i>. <br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
In a <a href="http://wordsmith.org/awad/awadmail356.html">recent newsletter</a> from Anu Garg, who runs the excellent “A Word a Day” e-mail list, a reader used an expression I hadn’t heard before. In talking about ritual mourners – people who are hired to wail and moan at funerals – she wrote:<br />
<br />
“He explained that the women did not actually faint, but were probably demonstrating the ‘cold robbies’, or the ‘fantods’, in their performance of what appeared to be fainting spells.”<br />
<br />
<i>Cold robbies</i> and <i>fantods</i> both require explanation.<br />
<br />
To get the fantods is to feel uneasy, queasy, or nervous. It’s often used in the phrase <i>the howling fantods</i>, which, as you might guess, is a particularly bad case of being nervous.<br />
<br />
Both the <i>Oxford English Dictionary</i> and the Collins-brand dictionaries define “fantod” as something like “crotchety or faddish behaviour”, which, to this American’s eyes, seems wrong.<br />
<br />
For one thing, I hardly think crotchety, which means “irritable or cranky”, covers it. “Faddish”, too, is a queer choice for the definition. If behaviour is faddish, that means that a person has a craze or a great deal of enthusiasm for something.<br />
<br />
Here’s what the fantods are, as far as I know: If you’re in an old building after dark and the lights suddenly go out and you hear mysterious noises in the other room and you begin to feel like something supernatural is breathing on your neck, <i>that’s</i> a case of the howling fantods.<br />
<br />
It’s not that the fantods are different in the United Kingdom, but in looking at the citations in the <i>Oxford English Dictionary</i>, and in the many uses I find over the past couple of centuries, I see that the fantods to some people have meant “fidgety, fussy, or frustrated behaviour” and to others they have meant “nervous behaviour, as if afflicted with some uncontrollable fit or emotion, even to the point of resembling a medical condition requiring treatment”.<br />
<br />
<i>Cold robbies</i> are even harder to get a handle on. It means more or less the same thing as “fantods” but it’s not very common as all.<br />
<br />
It seems to come from the comic <i>Pogo</i>, written and drawn by Walt Kelly. In one strip, one of the characters confuses the word <i>kohlrabi</i>, a type of cabbage, for the name of a disease, and then they mispronounce it as “cold robbies”. So, to have a case of the “cold robbies” is to have an unknown and uncertain affliction.<br />
<br />
Another similar term is <i>yips</i>. You could look up the yips in a medical textbook and perhaps find it under the term <i>focal dystonia</i>, but any pro golfer who has stood before a daunting putt could tell you all about them, too.<br />
<br />
As a golfing term in the 1930s, the <i>yips</i> were a mental condition which threw off one’s game or destroyed the control required to make difficult precision putts.<br />
<br />
Yips like these are strictly psychological. They make the hands do other than what the mind intends. Balls hook or slice, putts go wide. One golfer got such a case of the yips – or the mental yips, as they were often called – that he walked into closed doors.<br />
<br />
The yips sometimes refer to an actual tremor of the hands or full-body flinches which prevent good play. Golfer Sam Snead had the yips – he called them the <i>twitches</i>, and said one of his best seasons (and he had many) was due to working hard to fight the yips.<br />
<br />
The yips aren’t confined to the United States or golfers. Artists and musicians get the yips. Footballers in Australia get the yips. Basketball players who can’t make shots from the free-throw line, or even simple lay-ups, might have the yips. Baseball pitchers who can’t throw strikes might have the yips. More seriously, some doctors get the yips – shaky hands in the surgery having the potential to cause more damage than a wild pitch into the stands.<br />
<br />
Those of us who are non-professionals, though, get different afflictions when we’re nervous: the <i>willies</i>, the <i>heebie-jeebies</i>, the <i>screaming meemies</i>, the <i>screaming abdabs</i> (largely British), the <i>collywobbles</i>, the <i>jim-jams</i> (which often include a notion of emotional depression). There are many other less common words, too.<br />
<br />
The jim-jams are often used as a synonym for <i>the DTs</i>. These stand for <i>delirium tremens</i>, and refer to the shakes that alcoholics get when they’re suffering from withdrawal, that is, when they don’t have the alcohol that their bodies crave. Their entire bodies shake.<br />
<br />
The full form, delerium tremens, is more or less a medical term, but the abbreviate form, <i>the DTs</i>, is more humorous.<br />
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-05-06T00:19:39+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/a_conversation_with_roy_blount_jr/</guid>
      <title>A Conversation with Roy Blount Jr.</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/a_conversation_with_roy_blount_jr/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Personal, Language and Languages, My Commentary</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA["A Way with Words," the public radio show about language which I co-host and co-produce, just posted <a href="http://www.waywordradio.org/a-conversation-with-roy-blount-jr/">an audio interview I did with humorist and author Roy Blount Jr.</a> in which we talked, among other things, about his books, the Authors Guild, authors' rights, the Amazon Kindle 2, catfish noodling, and whether the cancan dancers at George Plimpton’s memorial honored the late writer’s request and performed without panties.]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-04-29T12:59:39+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
    <guid>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/putting_in_a_good_word_rating_words_chances_for_success/</guid>
      <title>Putting In A Good Word: rating words&#8217; chances for success</title>
      <link>http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/grantbarrett/putting_in_a_good_word_rating_words_chances_for_success/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Language and Languages, Dictionaries and Lexicography</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[I've got an <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/23/new-words-survival-opinions-books-barrett.html">article at Forbes this week</a>, in which I identify some new words and gauge their chance of success. It's part of a larger package of <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/04/23/english-language-word-opinions-books-neologisms_land.html">articles about neologisms</a>, with articles from Jon McWhorter, Ben Zimmer, Mark Peters, and others.<br />
<br />
...<br />
<br />
New words are like grains of sand on a beach. They appear in uncountable numbers, last for just a brief time and soon wash away. But some--usually the utilitarian, the memorable and the simple--come into common use.<br />
<br />
Grant Barrett, a dictionary editor and the co-host of public radio program <a href="http://www.waywordradio.org/" target="_blank">"A Way with Words,"</a> rates the chances of a few recently coined words below.<br />
<br />
<strong>AFPAK</strong>, <strong>Af-Pak</strong>. This two-year-old blend of <em>Af</em>ghanistan and <em>Pak</em>istan is used to refer to both countries. It's convenient to use when situations straddle both country's borders, or affect the region as a whole. It's also easy to say, easy to spell and used by journalists and diplomats, so there's a <em>high alert</em> chance of the word's continued success.<br />
<br />
<strong>Apatown</strong>. This is a Hollywood nickname for filmmaker Judd Apatow's pals and regular working partners, including Paul Rudd, Jason Segel and Seth Rogen. It's cutesy and already has the stink of a late night "where are they now?" retrospective. Chances of success? <em>Bomb.</em> What can rescue it? If Apatow puts out two great movies a year for the rest of his life.<br />
<br />
<strong>fang-banging</strong>. Sex with a vampire. Lithe, luscious necks always seem to attract the peepers of readers and theater-goers alike, so we rate this one as potentially <em>eternal.</em><br />
<br />
<strong>frugalista</strong>. A woman committed to staying fashionable even though her means have become limited. As long as there is a recession, there will be somebody knocking 'em dead by wearing last decade's skirt with a different belt and her sister's shoes. Along with its synonym, <em>recessionista</em>, a thigh-high chance of success.<br />
<br />
<strong>gay-marry</strong>. To marry someone of the same sex. With recent gay-marriage approvals across the country, this verb is poised to be greeted with toasts celebrating its noteworthy union with a dictionary in a few years.<br />
<br />
<strong>Netflix divorce</strong>. When a couple decides that their tastes are too different to share a single Netflix account, they get two instead. While this term is at least two years old, recent use has brought it new life. Even odds on this one: It could be <em>Gigli </em>or <em>Star Wars.</em> We'll know for sure when brick-and-mortar video stores go the way of hand-cranked-phone factories.<br />
<br />
<strong>reset button</strong>. This political argot <em>du jour</em> means starting over, a redo a second chance. As the metaphorical use of the term is at least seven years old, it's a cinch to say that its continued chance of success is very bright, but given its overuse, we also say <em>don't push it</em>.<br />
<br />
<strong>retronovation</strong>. Returning to a former way of producing a product--such as making soft drinks with cane sugar instead of corn syrup and shipping them in glass bottles--in order to attract nostalgic customers. This term, coined in March by blogger Tim Carmody of Snarkmarket, has been used so rarely that we're calling its chances <em>warm backwash</em>.<br />
<br />
<strong>schluff</strong>. Where bicycle-riding is forbidden or unwelcome, to <em>schluff</em> is to temporarily dismount and kind of half-straddle, half-push the bike. Though just a few months old, its odds of long-term success are <em>failure to stop</em>. <br />
<br />
<strong>spendulus</strong>. A jokey name for the Obama administration's economic stimulus package, a blend of the words "spend" and "stimulus." Much-loved by conservatives who continue to pepper their word salads with it. We'll call it <em>successful </em>with a chance of being <em>tired</em>.<br />
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-04-27T13:41:37+00:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>